A single lawsuit can produce hundreds of thousands of emails, contracts, communications, spreadsheets, and other types of digital documents. Searching for the relevant evidence, retaining all versions of these documents, and coordinating the team is nearly impossible using shared folders and manually reviewing the documents.
The solution to this problem comes from litigation support software that combines the process of document review, electronic discovery, collaboration, and case management in one platform.
Contemporary litigation management software also uses artificial intelligence for document analysis and task automation, helping legal teams improve collaboration and potentially reduce time-to-court by streamlining evidence management and case preparation. In this guide, you will learn about the best platforms in 2026, features, pricing model, and criteria to consider.
AI has become an inherent component of litigation support systems nowadays, assisting lawyers in reviewing documents and evidence to prepare a case more effectively.
The following platforms are widely adopted across law firms, corporate legal departments, and government organisations, and many UK-based software developers draw inspiration from their capabilities when developing bespoke legal software.
|
Platform |
Main feature |
Best suited for |
Typical pricing* |
|
RelativityOne |
AI-powered eDiscovery, document review, analytics |
Enterprise, global law firms |
Custom enterprise pricing |
|
Everlaw |
Cloud-native review with generative AI |
Mid-size to enterprise |
From around £250/month; enterprise quotes available |
|
DISCO |
AI-assisted document review and Cecilia AI |
Mid-size and enterprise |
Custom pricing |
|
LexisNexis CaseMap |
Case management, chronology, transcript analysis |
Small to enterprise legal teams |
Custom pricing |
|
Reveal |
Generative AI review and advanced analytics |
Enterprise and government |
Custom pricing |
*Pricing depends on the number of users, data volume, storage requirements, and licensing model.
Relativity continues to be the top player in the market with over 180,000 users, out of which 70+ are Fortune 100 companies and 198 Am Law 200 law firms. Everlaw is used by more than 40,000+ legal experts and can process a million documents an hour.
DISCO and Reveal are known for their artificial intelligence-powered review features while LexisNexis CaseMap is used for facts, witnesses, and evidence organisation in litigation.
Litigation Support Software is a specialised solution designed to assist law firms and legal departments in organising and managing evidence in any legal proceeding. ESI, documents, emails, witness statements, and case documents are centralised in a safe environment.
Tools for eDiscovery, artificial intelligence-based reviewing, collaboration, and compliance are built into the system, which supports all phases of litigation from start to finish.
Case management software and litigation support software play distinct roles that are somewhat similar. While case management software assists legal firms in managing cases and all other aspects like scheduling and billing, litigation support software is concerned with processes involving evidence gathering, like eDiscovery and document review.
|
Criteria |
Case management software |
Litigation support software |
|
Primary purpose |
Matter, deadline, billing, and client management |
Evidence review, eDiscovery, legal holds, and trial preparation |
|
Typical usage |
Law firms managing daily operations |
Litigation teams handling evidence-intensive matters |
|
Document review |
Basic document storage |
Advanced search, analytics, TAR, and production |
|
Legal hold |
Usually limited |
Often built into enterprise platforms |
This comparison will assist in determining whether an organisation requires a solution for handling everyday business of the firm or a specialised solution to handle evidence, data preservation, and complicated litigation cases.
Different litigation support software has varying strengths. Some focus on AI-based eDiscovery, while there are others that have capabilities for case management, trial preparation, or business-level investigations. The software listed below is well known in the legal community and applies to businesses of various sizes.
RelativityOne is one of the world’s leading cloud-based eDiscovery and legal software platforms. It is widely used by large law firms, multinational corporations, and government agencies to manage complex investigations and high-volume litigation.
Standout feature:
Advanced AI-powered document review with Relativity aiR.
Pros
Cons
Everlaw is cloud-native software for litigation that combines eDiscovery, document review, case preparation, and collaboration in a modern interface.
Standout feature:
Generative AI tools for document summarisation and legal review.
Pros
Cons
DISCO focuses on AI-assisted legal review, helping litigation teams process and analyse large document collections more efficiently.
Standout feature:
Cecilia AI legal assistant for natural-language document analysis.
Pros
Cons
Reveal is an enterprise eDiscovery platform designed for investigations involving large datasets and multilingual evidence.
Standout feature:
AI-driven visual analytics and relationship mapping.
Pros
Cons
CaseMap helps legal teams organise facts, witnesses, exhibits, timelines, and case evidence throughout litigation.
Standout feature:
Comprehensive fact and chronology management.
Pros
Cons
Logikcull simplifies eDiscovery for small and mid-sized legal teams by automating document collection, review, and production.
Standout feature:
Simple self-service eDiscovery workflow.
Pros
Cons
Nextpoint combines eDiscovery, document review, trial preparation, and case management in a single cloud platform.
Standout feature:
Integrated litigation workflow from discovery to trial.
Pros
Cons
CloudNine provides eDiscovery software for collecting, processing, reviewing, and producing electronically stored information.
Standout feature:
Flexible deployment for organisations of different sizes.
Pros
Cons
Contemporary support management systems incorporate document review capabilities, case management functions, collaboration facilities, and security systems into one package. The following features have become a necessity for legal teams dealing with complicated cases, investigations, and large amounts of electronic data.
The most up-to-date legal technology can go through hundreds, or even thousands, or millions of documents, emails, contracts, and other messages that relate to one particular case. eDiscovery is part of the software that indexes, removes duplicates, searches for keywords and concepts, and classifies the documents based on their relevance.
Many programs use predictive coding (Technology-Assisted Review or TAR), where AI learns from the lawyers’ decisions about document review to recognise the most important or confidential information.
According to McKinsey, generative AI could increase the overall economic potential of AI and analytics by 15% to 40%. The relevance of the study for litigation teams comes from its application to language-related functions such as document summarisation, categorisation, searching, and initial analysis of large sets of unstructured data.
A detailed chronology of facts is essential for developing a winning legal argument. Litigation management software enables legal teams to develop an interactive timeline linking facts to documents, witnesses, exhibits, and other evidence.
The use of visual timelines helps in understanding the sequence of events, identifying gaps in facts, preparing witness testimony, and developing a litigation strategy.
Litigation support systems assist organisations in maintaining relevant evidence through legal hold procedures, which ensure that documents cannot be altered or deleted while legal proceedings are in progress.
Enterprise-class systems also offer encryption, access controls based on roles, audit trails and compliance with laws including GDPR compliance. This enables organisations to secure sensitive data, show compliance and mitigate legal risks.
Legal litigation support software should fit the way a law firm operates today while supporting future growth. Security, integration, scalability, and usability are often more important than long feature lists. In some cases, bespoke software solutions provide a better fit than off-the-shelf products.
Cloud-based litigation software has become the preferred choice for many law firms because it provides secure remote access, automatic updates, predictable subscription costs, and the flexibility to scale as new cases arise. Security, backups, and infrastructure management are handled by the provider, reducing the workload for internal IT teams.
The service provider takes care of issues related to data security, backup, and infrastructure management, thereby relieving the organisation’s IT department of additional work.
In case of organisations that require extremely high levels of security and compliance, the on-premise solution is relevant. Government bodies and other businesses which have to handle extremely sensitive information prefer storing all their litigation information on their own infrastructure.
The litigation management software needs to be easily integrated with the software that is currently being used by the law firms. This includes CRM software, billing software, document management software, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, and email services, and will help avoid any duplicate efforts and ensure consistency in the data within various departments.
Before choosing a litigation management platform, make sure that the platform can be integrated with all the necessary APIs, connectors, and third-party apps.
No litigation support software will work effectively for all legal teams. A single solicitor who deals with employment matters has different needs than a large company dealing with international investigations. The choice of litigation support should be based on workload, type of documents involved, regulations, and future growth.
Small organisations do not have the need for enterprise-level infrastructure. There is an increased cost of operation in purchasing advanced tools that would not even get used at all. It is important to find solutions that can offer:
Quick access to reviewing documents after just hours from sign-up rather than weeks is more valuable than customisation.
With team growth, coordination becomes as significant as reviewing documents. Several lawyers might be examining the same evidence at the same time, and therefore need to have uniform processes and total visibility of all decisions. Look out for:
Such features make it possible for firms to handle bigger cases without having to increase their administrative workload in the same proportion.
Larger enterprises normally review litigation software as part of their wider IT and compliance approach. Factors like security, governance, and integration may be of more importance than specific productivity capabilities. Enterprise buyers should verify:
For an enterprise-level use case, it would also make sense to find out from vendors maximum data volume support, average processing speed, disaster recovery practices, and referrals from similar organisations.
Costs of litigation support software vary based on the licensing of the software platform. Some suppliers use a per-user basis for payment, some base their prices on data processing volume, while others offer customised quotations.
Comparing subscription fees with custom software development cost can help organisations determine which approach offers better long-term value.
|
Pricing model |
How it works |
Best suited for |
|
Per user / Per month |
A recurring subscription fee is charged for each user. Features are often grouped into different subscription tiers. |
Boutique firms, solo practitioners, and mid-sized law firms using cloud-based SaaS platforms |
|
Per gigabyte |
Charges are based on the volume of data collected, processed, reviewed, or stored. Some providers bill separately for hosting and processing. |
eDiscovery projects, investigations, and litigation involving large document collections |
|
Flat fee / Enterprise custom |
Pricing is negotiated according to the number of users, deployment model, storage requirements, integrations, and support services. |
Large law firms, corporate legal departments, and government organisations |
Subscription pricing is not the only financial factor in play here. In many cases, there are other factors that have to be accounted for in the budget, such as:
In the case of enterprise-level implementations, the costs will further include custom integration, premium support, and extra cloud storage. Thus, taking all those factors into account along with the licence pricing gives a better idea of ownership costs.
Litigation support software has become an essential part of modern legal practice as the volume of digital evidence continues to grow. The right platform can improve document review, strengthen collaboration, support regulatory compliance, and help legal teams manage complex matters more efficiently.
Every organisation has different operational, technical, and security requirements, so the best choice depends on case complexity, expected data volumes, integration needs, and available budget. Taking time to evaluate these factors before implementation increases the likelihood of choosing a solution that remains effective as legal workloads and business requirements evolve.
eDiscovery software focuses on collecting, reviewing, and producing electronic evidence. Litigation support software includes eDiscovery alongside case management, collaboration, trial preparation, legal hold, and reporting tools.
Cloud-based platforms can often be deployed within a few days. Enterprise implementations involving data migration, integrations, and user training typically take several weeks or months.
No. Most platforms are designed for legal professionals and require minimal technical knowledge for daily use. Administrators may need additional training to configure security, permissions, and integrations.
Share this article:
